All posts filed under: Faculty Commentary

So You Want To Be A Sports Lawyer?

I receive a lot of inquiries from law students, recent graduates, and even senior lawyers asking for advice about breaking into sports law. Many of these messages come from students and lawyers from other states who follow me on social media or who have attended panels or seminars where I served as a featured speaker. It is truly humbling. I am always open to talking with anyone in the legal profession who shares my passion for sports law and the commitment to the analytical, negotiation, and drafting skills that this practice area demands. But the harsh reality is that getting a job in sports law is often not based on merit alone. The selection process is heavily weighted towards relationships and prior experience. Everyone wants in on sports; practicing in this area brings with it a certain “cool” factor. People will work harder to be a sports lawyer, many will take a pay cut just get in the door. But getting those jobs are often based just as much on good timing and personal contacts …

Partners in the Movement: Reflections on Movement Lawyering

As a former middle school teacher, what brought me to Temple Law as a student was a not-fully-defined goal of partnering with youth to address education injustice through policy change. At the time I didn’t have the language of “movement lawyering” to describe my goal, but was fortunate to end up at the movement lawyering organization Advancement Project as an attorney on the education justice team. In this role I partnered with youth organizers across the country to provide legal and policy support for their education justice campaigns. We took on school policing, strengthened Sanctuary Schools policies, and built campaigns for school mental health from the ground up. I am honored to continue partnering on some of this work now. Returning to Temple as faculty, I was excited to see so much interest in movement lawyering among the student body. I also often receive questions (and sometimes field misconceptions) about what exactly movement lawyering is, questions that inspired me to write this piece based on my experience. To clear up a few things at the …

One Juror, No Verdict: What the Lindsay Clancy Mistrial Tells Us About Jury Unanimity

After more than five weeks of testimony and seven days of deliberations, the Massachusetts murder trial of Lindsay Clancy ended Friday without a verdict. Clancy was charged with three counts of first-degree murder for the January 2023 deaths of her children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. There was no dispute at trial that Clancy killed the children. The central question was instead one of criminal responsibility: Was Clancy legally responsible for her actions, or was she so profoundly mentally ill that Massachusetts law did not permit the jury to hold her criminally accountable? Twelve jurors could not unanimously answer that question. On September 4, Superior Court Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial. A mistrial is neither an acquittal nor a conviction. In Clancy’s case, the unusual circumstances surrounding the jury’s deadlock raise important questions about jury unanimity, juror independence, and what happens next. When a Jury Cannot Agree Criminal jury verdicts must be unanimous. But disagreement does not automatically produce a mistrial.  When jurors report that they have reached an impasse, judges …

Why Top Global Law Firms Are Racing to Build Sports Law Practices

The legal industry is undergoing a noticeable shift, and the latest battleground isn’t technology, private equity, or corporate restructurings—it’s sports. Over the past year, six of the world’s leading law firms have launched or significantly expanded dedicated sports law practices, signaling that sports law has evolved as one of the most attractive practice sectors. This isn’t a series of isolated hiring decisions. It’s a strategic move to secure expertise in a market where demand is accelerating faster than the supply of experienced legal talent. The most recent entrant is Paul Hastings, which has officially launched a global sports practice by hiring two highly regarded lawyers with deep experience across the industry. The firm recruited Brandon Etheridge, formerly the general counsel of the Baltimore Ravens, alongside sports mergers and acquisitions specialist Mark Zerdin. Zerdin is well known for advising on complex business transactions, including General Motors’ high-profile entry into Formula 1 with the Cadillac Formula 1 team. However, Paul Hastings is not alone. Several of the world’s most prestigious law firms—including Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & …

Diaz Lecture

The 2026 Díaz Professorship Lecture: Slavery Parallels and Differences Between the US and Puerto Rico

On March 27, 2026, Professor Daniel Morales-Armstrong of NYU presented a fascinating lecture on a little-known story about slavery in Puerto Rico which illustrates significant similarities and differences between slavery in the United States and Puerto Rico.  To a student of history, the parallels between slavery in the United States and Puerto Rico through the mid-nineteenth century are striking. Slavery was brought to Puerto Rico (a Spanish colony from 1492 through 1898) as early as 1518 in order to satisfy the labor needs of an expanding plantation economy primarily based on sugar cane. As was the case in the United States, slaves were subjected to brutal and dangerous living conditions. As a result, many rebelled against their masters or escaped from their plantations. Because of Puerto Rico’s geography, many escaped slaves were able to evade recapture and establish communities of their own throughout the island. These were similar to many of the “maroon” communities established by former slaves in the United States. The institution of slavery itself was a socially disabling and controversial institution. By …

From the Picket Line to the Podium: Professor Jonathan Harris on the Field of Labor and Employment Law and Why It Matters Now

Long before I was a law professor, I was an organizer. I spent time on picket lines, at the bargaining table, and in the homes of working people discussing their daily struggles. That experience gave me an up-close understanding of how the law shapes workers’ lives and where it falls short. It’s what brought me to law school and eventually to academia, and it’s a perspective I bring to every course I teach. A bit about me. I began my legal career as a Skadden Fellow providing bilingual legal services at the intersection of employment and consumer law. From there, I clerked for Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge James Graves before advocating for workers and their unions at a private firm, in-house at a nurses’ union, and at the New York City Commission on Human Rights. Since becoming a full-time professor, I’ve taught at NYU Law School and Loyola Law School Los Angeles, and I’m a past chair of the Association of American Law Schools Section on Labor Relations and Employment Law. I’m …

Law library in Klein Hall from the view point of the top floor looking down.

1L Grades Have Dropped: Now What?

You made it through half of your 1L year, you (hopefully) had some rest and rejuvenation away from law school, and now we have ruined it all by posting your grades right before you had to jump into your second semester. Sorry about that. Now that you have had a few days to freak out, look at your grades, freak out again, and sleep on it a couple of nights, here are a few thoughts from someone who has seen a lot of students go through this. Most importantly, as I tell my students every fall after they take the exam, law school exams do not indicate how smart you are or how good a lawyer you are going to be. Law school exams evaluate specific skills that you are still very much in the process of learning. If you had me for Contracts, that grade tells you how you did on issue-spotter essays about contracts and Muppets on one day in December. I know that your grade feels incredibly consequential, but it is one …

A Message from Interim Kean Family Dean Kristen E. Murray

Editor’s note: The following message was shared by incoming interim dean Kristen E. Murray with the Temple Law community. I am honored and excited to serve as interim dean at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Temple Law is a special place in which an extraordinary community of faculty, staff, and students work together to serve our city and shape the future of our profession. Grounded in our historic mission of access to excellence, we deliver a world-class legal education that integrates a rigorous doctrinal curriculum with powerful skill-building and experiential opportunities, professional development and mentorship, and the principles of ethical leadership. I am grateful to President John Fry for the opportunity to lead the law school through this transition, and grateful to Dean Rachel Rebouché for her transformational leadership, vision, and service. Among Dean Rebouché’s marks on our institutional identity has been the development of three strategic priorities – student success, elevated reputation and impact, and sustaining a diverse, inclusive community – which have guided our growth as an institution. As we navigate this …

A Message from Outgoing Dean Rachel Rebouchè

Content: Editor’s note: The following message was shared by outgoing dean Rachel Rebouchè with alumni and friends of Temple Law School as she steps down from the deanship to join the faculty at University of Texas – Austin School of Law.   Dear Alumni and Friends, As many of you may know, I will step down as Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law at the end of the summer and join the faculty at the University of Texas at Austin this fall. Although this was a challenging decision to make, I am excited and confident about the future because Temple Law is thriving. Our faculty, administration and staff have reached many milestones over the past several years. The law school celebrated an over 90% bar passage rate for first-time test takers, the highest in more than a decade, and the highest employment rates for new graduates two years in a row; we hired 16 new faculty members; and our development efforts have secured an endowed deanship and multiple new scholarships enabling Temple Law …

A Seismic Shift with an Unstable Foundation: The NCAA House Settlement Under Scrutiny

The NCAA’s $2.8 billion settlement in House v. NCAA marks a seismic shift in college athletics. For decades, the NCAA denied college athletes the right to earn any money from their participation in sports, arguing that doing so would undermine the “amateurism” model of college athletics even as it raked in massive revenue—$1 billion annually from “March Madness” alone. Accepting a slice of pizza or a ride to the airport from a coach could be deemed an impermissible “extra benefit” that landed the athlete in hot water with NCAA enforcement staff. Even when their images were used to sell video games, the NCAA made money, their school made money, and the producer of the video game made money—but the athlete could not be paid a dime. The House settlement, reached because of massive damages that the association faced from lawsuits under the antitrust laws that threatened its very existence, changed the landscape completely. Schools can now share up to $20.5 million of their annual athletic revenue from media rights deals, ticket sales, and sponsorships directly …