Roe V. Wade Was Overturned. Here’s What’s Next For America
Interim Dean Rachel Rebouché joins KYW’s InDepth podcast to discuss what’s next for America now that Roe v. Wade has been overturned. Listen here.
Interim Dean Rachel Rebouché joins KYW’s InDepth podcast to discuss what’s next for America now that Roe v. Wade has been overturned. Listen here.
Interim Dean Rachel Rebouché discussed the immediate aftermath of today’s ruling overturning Roe and its potential impact on other cases grounded in substantive due process with CBS3’s Ukee Washington. Read more.
Prof. Jonathan Lipson discusses vertical forum shopping in Chapter 11 litigation and its implications for the dignitary interests of personal injury creditors on Harvard Law School’s Bankruptcy Roundtable. Read more.
Abortion advocates are exploring whether the anonymity of cryptocurrency could shield providers and patients from litigation. Interim Dean Rachel Rebouché says it won’t help circumvent abortion bans. Read more.
Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and co-authors Jonas Anderson and Jason Rantanen post an update on their research into judge shopping by patent litigants in the Western District of Texas. Read more.
If the leaked Dobbs opinion becomes final, abortion would be banned immediately in states with so-called “trigger laws.” But what that means will vary widely from state to state, says interim Dean Rachel Rebouché, who predicts “an era of interstate conflict and perplexity.” Read more.
If Roe falls as expected this summer, interim Dean Rachel Rebouché predicts that states will try to exercise control over abortion access beyond their borders – an issue with great significance for PA, which sits between states seeking to both ban and protect the procedure. Read more.
As Senate Democrats and the White House consider tactics for protecting abortion access if Roe falls, interim Dean Rachel Rebouché says that while none of their options are immune from challenge, it’s worth exploring what’s possible despite the likelihood of a hostile federal judiciary. Read more.
Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and co-authors Jonas Anderson and Jason Rantanen discuss their research into the use of mandamus petitions by parties seeking Federal Circuit Review of patent infringement cases being tried in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas. Read more.
The Financial Times credits research by Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and co-author Jonas Anderson with sounding the alarm over Texas Judge Alan Albright’s apparent openness to judge-shopping by patent-litigation plaintiffs. Read more.