Prof. Jules Epstein makes the case for abolition of the death penalty in PA as “just, smart, moral, and good criminal justice policy.” Read More

Prof. Salil Mehra discusses the DOJ’s lawsuit against Google for ProMarket. Read More

The border between personal and professional has become blurred, says Prof. Tom Lin, and employers are finding it difficult to navigate as sensitive issues like abortion coverage require corporate responses. Read More

Google is under fire from the DOJ for allegedly destroying evidence in anticipation of litigation. Prof Salil Mehra discusses possible consequences if a court agrees. Read More

Dean Rachel Rebouche and co-authors David S. Cohen and Greer Donley lay out the FDA’s options in the event a Texas judge rules that abortion pills should be removed from the market. Read More

Prof. Mark Rahdert says that for SCOTUS’s conservative majority to rule against Pres. Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan, they would need to “backpedal” from their emphasis on reading laws for exactly what they say and nothing more. Read More

Prof. Mark Rahdert explains why standing could be an issue for the individual borrowers suing to stop student loan debt relief. Read More

In order to ban abortion pills nationwide, the Comstock Act would have to “be raised from the dead,” says Dean Rachel Rebouche. Read More

President Biden’s student loan debt relief plan is under challenge at the Supreme Court, with high stakes far beyond the merits of the case itself. But first, says Prof. Rahdert, plaintiffs will need to show they have standing to be there at all – a hurdle they may be unable to overcome. Read More

A dozen Democratic attorneys general have sued the FDA, demanding the removal of “onerous” abortion pill restrictions. The lawsuit reflects what Dean Rebouche says are concerns that the current regulation is based in political, not safety, concerns. Read More