New scholarship from Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and Pyry Koivula LAW ’22 examines the shifting balance of power among the Federal Circuit, Patent Office, and Solicitor General, with analysis of its implications for patent doctrine. Read more.

New scholarship from Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and Pyry Koivula LAW ’22 examines the shifting balance of power among the Federal Circuit, Patent Office, and Solicitor General, with analysis of its implications for patent doctrine. Read More

A new order randomizing assignments in the Western District of Texas brings judge shopping in patent cases to an end. Prof. Paul Gugliuzza calls it the biggest development in patent law this year. Read more.

Professor Paul Gugliuzza and co-authors Jonas Anderson and Jason Rantanen share further data from their research into how appellate patent litigation fares at the Federal Circuit. Read more.

Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and co-authors Jonas Anderson and Jason Rantanen post an update on their research into judge shopping by patent litigants in the Western District of Texas. Read more.

Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and co-authors Jonas Anderson and Jason Rantanen discuss their research into the use of mandamus petitions by parties seeking Federal Circuit Review of patent infringement cases being tried in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas. Read more.

The Financial Times credits research by Prof. Paul Gugliuzza and co-author Jonas Anderson with sounding the alarm over Texas Judge Alan Albright’s apparent openness to judge-shopping by patent-litigation plaintiffs. Read more.

Interim Dean Rachel Rebouché and Professor Paul Gugliuzza join JDSupra’s Sidebar podcast to discuss gender inequality in patent litigation. Read more.

Law360 turns to data and analysis by Prof. Paul Gugliuzza to examine changes in Judge Alan Albright’s decision-making over venue in patent litigation. Read more at Law 360.

Prof. Paul Gugliuzza’s examination of one Texas judge’s outsized control over patent litigation gets noted in this MSNBC article about forum-shopping in Texas district courts.