{"id":4460,"date":"2020-06-30T14:04:28","date_gmt":"2020-06-30T18:04:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?p=4460"},"modified":"2020-06-30T14:34:15","modified_gmt":"2020-06-30T18:34:15","slug":"temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"

On June 29, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Breyer delivered the 5-4 opinion in June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo<\/em>, holding that Louisiana’s Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

Rachel Rebouch\u00e9\"\"<\/a>
\nAssociate Dean for Research
\nProfessor of Law<\/h2>\n

Generally, this is a win for abortion supporters, and a decision many did not expect. Justice Breyer relied heavily on the factual record developed by the District Court and ruled that the law was the same in its effect and purpose as the Texas law struck down in 2016. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a concurrence, ruling on grounds of stare decisis and providing the 5th vote needed to strike down the restriction. His concurrence is quite narrow, though, and it suggests that the Chief Justice interprets prior caselaw as giving far more deference to states than the Court\u2019s 2016 ruling did.<\/p>\n

Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq.\"\"<\/a>
\nProgram Manager
\nCenter for Public Health Law Research<\/h2>\n

This SCOTUS decision reaffirms what was already established 4 years ago in the Whole Woman\u2019s Health case\u2014that admitting privilege requirements unconstitutionally burden abortion access while providing no health or safety benefits. Although this is another significant victory for abortion rights, Louisiana still has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country. State laws that impede access disproportionately harm people of color and rural communities, standing in the way of achieving reproductive health equity. This narrow ruling is only one step in the ongoing work to dismantle the numerous barriers to safe abortion care for all.<\/p>\n

For Temple Law reactions to other SCOTUS decisions, click here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On June 29, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Breyer delivered the 5-4 opinion in June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, holding that Louisiana’s Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, is unconstitutional. Rachel Rebouch\u00e9 Associate Dean for Research Professor of Law Generally, this is a win for abortion supporters, and a decision many did not expect. Justice Breyer relied heavily on the factual record developed by the District Court and ruled that the law was the same in its effect and purpose as the Texas law struck down in 2016. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a concurrence, ruling on grounds of stare decisis and providing the 5th vote needed to strike down the restriction. His concurrence is quite narrow, though, and it suggests that the Chief Justice interprets prior caselaw as giving far more deference to states than the Court\u2019s 2016 ruling did. Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq. Program Manager Center for Public Health Law Research This SCOTUS decision reaffirms what was already established 4 years ago …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":4360,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,10],"tags":[871,861,869,872,870,313,868],"audience":[55,54],"coauthors":[705,867,1066],"class_list":["post-4460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-faculty-commentary","category-trending","tag-abortion-access","tag-faculty-react-to-scotus","tag-health-law","tag-june-medical-services","tag-reproductive-rights","tag-scotus","tag-scouts-ruling","audience-practitioners","audience-students"],"yoast_head":"\r\nTemple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On June 29, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Breyer delivered the 5-4 opinion in June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, holding that Louisiana’s Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, is unconstitutional. Rachel Rebouch\u00e9 Associate Dean for Research Professor of Law Generally, this is a win for abortion supporters, and a decision many did not expect. Justice Breyer relied heavily on the factual record developed by the District Court and ruled that the law was the same in its effect and purpose as the Texas law struck down in 2016. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a concurrence, ruling on grounds of stare decisis and providing the 5th vote needed to strike down the restriction. His concurrence is quite narrow, though, and it suggests that the Chief Justice interprets prior caselaw as giving far more deference to states than the Court\u2019s 2016 ruling did. Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq. Program Manager Center for Public Health Law Research This SCOTUS decision reaffirms what was already established 4 years ago …\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-30T18:04:28+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-06-30T18:34:15+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1293\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"581\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dean Rachel Rebouch\u00e9, Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq., Amber Bethune\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dean Rachel Rebouch\u00e9, Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq., Amber Bethune\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Amber Bethune\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\"},\"headline\":\"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-30T18:04:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-30T18:34:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":282,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abortion Access\",\"Faculty React to SCOTUS\",\"Health Law\",\"June Medical Services\",\"Reproductive Rights\",\"SCOTUS\",\"SCOUTS Ruling\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Faculty Commentary\",\"Trending\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/\",\"name\":\"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-30T18:04:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-30T18:34:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"width\":1293,\"height\":581},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\",\"name\":\"Voices at Temple\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\",\"name\":\"Amber Bethune\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g49f6eed04a5dcf74b19c4274c59af23c\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Amber Bethune\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/author\\\/tug31039\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","og_description":"On June 29, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Breyer delivered the 5-4 opinion in June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, holding that Louisiana’s Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, is unconstitutional. Rachel Rebouch\u00e9 Associate Dean for Research Professor of Law Generally, this is a win for abortion supporters, and a decision many did not expect. Justice Breyer relied heavily on the factual record developed by the District Court and ruled that the law was the same in its effect and purpose as the Texas law struck down in 2016. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a concurrence, ruling on grounds of stare decisis and providing the 5th vote needed to strike down the restriction. His concurrence is quite narrow, though, and it suggests that the Chief Justice interprets prior caselaw as giving far more deference to states than the Court\u2019s 2016 ruling did. Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq. Program Manager Center for Public Health Law Research This SCOTUS decision reaffirms what was already established 4 years ago …","og_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/","og_site_name":"Voices at Temple","article_published_time":"2020-06-30T18:04:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-06-30T18:34:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1293,"height":581,"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dean Rachel Rebouch\u00e9, Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq., Amber Bethune","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dean Rachel Rebouch\u00e9, Adrienne R. Ghorashi, Esq., Amber Bethune","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/"},"author":{"name":"Amber Bethune","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0"},"headline":"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision","datePublished":"2020-06-30T18:04:28+00:00","dateModified":"2020-06-30T18:34:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/"},"wordCount":282,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","keywords":["Abortion Access","Faculty React to SCOTUS","Health Law","June Medical Services","Reproductive Rights","SCOTUS","SCOUTS Ruling"],"articleSection":["Faculty Commentary","Trending"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/","name":"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","datePublished":"2020-06-30T18:04:28+00:00","dateModified":"2020-06-30T18:34:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","width":1293,"height":581},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-reacts-to-the-june-medical-services-llc-v-russo-scotus-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Temple Law Reacts to the June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo SCOTUS Decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/","name":"Voices at Temple","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0","name":"Amber Bethune","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g49f6eed04a5dcf74b19c4274c59af23c","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Amber Bethune"},"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/author\/tug31039\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4460"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4469,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4460\/revisions\/4469"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4460"},{"taxonomy":"audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/audience?post=4460"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}