{"id":4386,"date":"2020-06-18T16:31:56","date_gmt":"2020-06-18T20:31:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?p=4386"},"modified":"2020-06-18T16:39:42","modified_gmt":"2020-06-18T20:39:42","slug":"temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On June 18, 2020, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr delivered the 5-4 opinion in <em>Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California<\/em>,\u00a0 holding that DHS&#8217;s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.<\/p>\n<h2>Jennifer J. Lee <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-4387 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_-262x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"262\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_-262x300.jpg 262w, https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_-896x1024.jpg 896w, https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_-768x878.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_-1344x1536.jpg 1344w, https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_-1791x2048.jpg 1791w, https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jennifer.lee2_.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 262px) 100vw, 262px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nAssociate Clinical Professor of Law<\/h2>\n<p>For the over 600,000 DACA recipients across the country, the Supreme Court\u2019s decision is essential in providing them with a temporary reprieve. While eventful, today\u2019s decision solely ruled that the Trump administration\u2019s rescission of the program was improper based on procedural grounds. The reality, therefore, is that any presidential administration in the future can wipe out the DACA program so long as it does so with proper procedure. For this reason, DACA recipients are continuing to fight for a more permanent pathway to citizenship. As DACA recipients have ample support, the challenge is not in getting such a law enacted. Rather, they want a \u201cclean\u201d law that does not otherwise include harsh enforcement provisions against the immigrants left behind\u2013who may be family or members of their communities.<\/p>\n<p><em>For Temple Law faculty reactions to other SCOTUS decisions, <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/tag\/faculty-react-to-scotus\/\">click here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On June 18, 2020, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr delivered the 5-4 opinion in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California,\u00a0 holding that DHS&#8217;s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. Jennifer J. Lee Associate Clinical Professor of Law For the over 600,000 DACA recipients across the country, the Supreme Court\u2019s decision is essential in providing them with a temporary reprieve. While eventful, today\u2019s decision solely ruled that the Trump administration\u2019s rescission of the program was improper based on procedural grounds. The reality, therefore, is that any presidential administration in the future can wipe out the DACA program so long as it does so with proper procedure. For this reason, DACA recipients are continuing to fight for a more permanent pathway to citizenship. As DACA recipients have ample support, the challenge is not in getting such a law enacted. Rather, they want a \u201cclean\u201d law that does not otherwise include harsh enforcement provisions against the immigrants &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":4360,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[664,861,313,856,312],"audience":[55,54],"coauthors":[44,1066],"class_list":["post-4386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-faculty-commentary","tag-daca","tag-faculty-react-to-scotus","tag-scotus","tag-scotus-ruling","tag-supreme-court","audience-practitioners","audience-students"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\r\n<title>Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On June 18, 2020, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr delivered the 5-4 opinion in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California,\u00a0 holding that DHS&#8217;s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. Jennifer J. Lee Associate Clinical Professor of Law For the over 600,000 DACA recipients across the country, the Supreme Court\u2019s decision is essential in providing them with a temporary reprieve. While eventful, today\u2019s decision solely ruled that the Trump administration\u2019s rescission of the program was improper based on procedural grounds. The reality, therefore, is that any presidential administration in the future can wipe out the DACA program so long as it does so with proper procedure. For this reason, DACA recipients are continuing to fight for a more permanent pathway to citizenship. As DACA recipients have ample support, the challenge is not in getting such a law enacted. Rather, they want a \u201cclean\u201d law that does not otherwise include harsh enforcement provisions against the immigrants &hellip;\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-18T20:31:56+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-06-18T20:39:42+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1293\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"581\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jennifer J. Lee, Amber Bethune\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jennifer J. Lee, Amber Bethune\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Amber Bethune\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\"},\"headline\":\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-18T20:31:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-18T20:39:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":215,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"DACA\",\"Faculty React to SCOTUS\",\"SCOTUS\",\"SCOTUS Ruling\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Faculty Commentary\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/\",\"name\":\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-18T20:31:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-18T20:39:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"width\":1293,\"height\":581},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\",\"name\":\"Voices at Temple\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\",\"name\":\"Amber Bethune\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g49f6eed04a5dcf74b19c4274c59af23c\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Amber Bethune\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/author\\\/tug31039\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","og_description":"On June 18, 2020, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr delivered the 5-4 opinion in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California,\u00a0 holding that DHS&#8217;s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. Jennifer J. Lee Associate Clinical Professor of Law For the over 600,000 DACA recipients across the country, the Supreme Court\u2019s decision is essential in providing them with a temporary reprieve. While eventful, today\u2019s decision solely ruled that the Trump administration\u2019s rescission of the program was improper based on procedural grounds. The reality, therefore, is that any presidential administration in the future can wipe out the DACA program so long as it does so with proper procedure. For this reason, DACA recipients are continuing to fight for a more permanent pathway to citizenship. As DACA recipients have ample support, the challenge is not in getting such a law enacted. Rather, they want a \u201cclean\u201d law that does not otherwise include harsh enforcement provisions against the immigrants &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/","og_site_name":"Voices at Temple","article_published_time":"2020-06-18T20:31:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-06-18T20:39:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1293,"height":581,"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jennifer J. Lee, Amber Bethune","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jennifer J. Lee, Amber Bethune","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/"},"author":{"name":"Amber Bethune","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0"},"headline":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision","datePublished":"2020-06-18T20:31:56+00:00","dateModified":"2020-06-18T20:39:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/"},"wordCount":215,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","keywords":["DACA","Faculty React to SCOTUS","SCOTUS","SCOTUS Ruling","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Faculty Commentary"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/","name":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","datePublished":"2020-06-18T20:31:56+00:00","dateModified":"2020-06-18T20:39:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","width":1293,"height":581},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-univ-of-california-scotus-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of California SCOTUS Decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/","name":"Voices at Temple","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0","name":"Amber Bethune","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g49f6eed04a5dcf74b19c4274c59af23c","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Amber Bethune"},"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/author\/tug31039\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4386"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4392,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4386\/revisions\/4392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4386"},{"taxonomy":"audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/audience?post=4386"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}