{"id":4354,"date":"2020-06-15T21:17:44","date_gmt":"2020-06-16T01:17:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?p=4354"},"modified":"2020-06-18T16:39:39","modified_gmt":"2020-06-18T20:39:39","slug":"temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"

On June 15, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the 6-3 opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia<\/em>, holding that employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under Title VII. The landmark decision is widely viewed as an historic moment in the movement for LGBTQ equality.<\/p>\n

\"\" Leonore F. Carpenter
\nAssociate Professor of Law<\/a><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Don’t underestimate the enormous power of this decision. Everyone loved the marriage decisions because everyone loves love. But frankly, not everyone has any desire to get married. However, in a nation with a fraying social safety net, job security is absolutely critical to all of us, particularly those on the economic margins. In my mind, this decision is at least as important as Windsor<\/em> or Obergefell<\/em>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ellie Margolis\"\"<\/a>
\nProfessor of Law<\/h2>\n

The Bostock<\/em> decision is a huge victory for legal equality in this country. It will provide a measure of security to countless LGBTQIA workers who no longer have to fear losing their jobs because of who they are or who they love. The Court\u2019s reasoning lays the groundwork for supporting a similar interpretation of the Fair Housing Act, Title IX, and maybe even the Equal Protection Clause. It is a giant leap forward.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Brishen Rogers\"\"<\/a>
\nAssociate Professor of Law<\/h2>\n

It is an historic opinion, perhaps the most important Title VII decision since the Court recognized hostile work environment sexual harassment in 1986. It is the result of decades of work by LGBTQI+ organizations and individuals, which included litigation, lobbying, and a great deal of direct action. It also would have been unthinkable just a decade ago. There is still a great deal of work to be done to ensure equality and fairness for all workers, but Bostock<\/em> is a major step in the right direction.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

For Temple Law faculty reactions to other SCOTUS decisions, click here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On June 15, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the 6-3 opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, holding that employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under Title VII. The landmark decision is widely viewed as an historic moment in the movement for LGBTQ equality. Leonore F. Carpenter Associate Professor of Law Don’t underestimate the enormous power of this decision. Everyone loved the marriage decisions because everyone loves love. But frankly, not everyone has any desire to get married. However, in a nation with a fraying social safety net, job security is absolutely critical to all of us, particularly those on the economic margins. In my mind, this decision is at least as important as Windsor or Obergefell.   Ellie Margolis Professor of Law The Bostock decision is a huge victory for legal equality in this country. It will provide a measure of security to countless LGBTQIA workers who no longer have to fear losing their jobs because of who they are or who they love. The …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":4360,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[853,861,854,313,856,855],"audience":[617,55,54],"coauthors":[24,26,222,1066],"class_list":["post-4354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-faculty-commentary","tag-bostock","tag-faculty-react-to-scotus","tag-lgbtqia","tag-scotus","tag-scotus-ruling","tag-title-vii","audience-incoming-students","audience-practitioners","audience-students"],"yoast_head":"\r\nTemple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On June 15, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the 6-3 opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, holding that employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under Title VII. The landmark decision is widely viewed as an historic moment in the movement for LGBTQ equality. Leonore F. Carpenter Associate Professor of Law Don’t underestimate the enormous power of this decision. Everyone loved the marriage decisions because everyone loves love. But frankly, not everyone has any desire to get married. However, in a nation with a fraying social safety net, job security is absolutely critical to all of us, particularly those on the economic margins. In my mind, this decision is at least as important as Windsor or Obergefell.   Ellie Margolis Professor of Law The Bostock decision is a huge victory for legal equality in this country. It will provide a measure of security to countless LGBTQIA workers who no longer have to fear losing their jobs because of who they are or who they love. The …\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-16T01:17:44+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-06-18T20:39:39+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1293\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"581\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ellie Margolis, Brishen Rogers, Leonore F. Carpenter, Amber Bethune\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ellie Margolis, Brishen Rogers, Leonore F. Carpenter, Amber Bethune\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Amber Bethune\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\"},\"headline\":\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-16T01:17:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-18T20:39:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":321,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Bostock\",\"Faculty React to SCOTUS\",\"LGBTQIA\",\"SCOTUS\",\"SCOTUS Ruling\",\"Title VII\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Faculty Commentary\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/\",\"name\":\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-16T01:17:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-18T20:39:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg\",\"width\":1293,\"height\":581},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\",\"name\":\"Voices at Temple\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0\",\"name\":\"Amber Bethune\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g49f6eed04a5dcf74b19c4274c59af23c\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Amber Bethune\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/author\\\/tug31039\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","og_description":"On June 15, 2020, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the 6-3 opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, holding that employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under Title VII. The landmark decision is widely viewed as an historic moment in the movement for LGBTQ equality. Leonore F. Carpenter Associate Professor of Law Don’t underestimate the enormous power of this decision. Everyone loved the marriage decisions because everyone loves love. But frankly, not everyone has any desire to get married. However, in a nation with a fraying social safety net, job security is absolutely critical to all of us, particularly those on the economic margins. In my mind, this decision is at least as important as Windsor or Obergefell.   Ellie Margolis Professor of Law The Bostock decision is a huge victory for legal equality in this country. It will provide a measure of security to countless LGBTQIA workers who no longer have to fear losing their jobs because of who they are or who they love. The …","og_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/","og_site_name":"Voices at Temple","article_published_time":"2020-06-16T01:17:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-06-18T20:39:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1293,"height":581,"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ellie Margolis, Brishen Rogers, Leonore F. Carpenter, Amber Bethune","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ellie Margolis, Brishen Rogers, Leonore F. Carpenter, Amber Bethune","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/"},"author":{"name":"Amber Bethune","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0"},"headline":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision","datePublished":"2020-06-16T01:17:44+00:00","dateModified":"2020-06-18T20:39:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/"},"wordCount":321,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","keywords":["Bostock","Faculty React to SCOTUS","LGBTQIA","SCOTUS","SCOTUS Ruling","Title VII"],"articleSection":["Faculty Commentary"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/","name":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision - Voices at Temple","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","datePublished":"2020-06-16T01:17:44+00:00","dateModified":"2020-06-18T20:39:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","width":1293,"height":581},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/temple-law-faculty-react-to-the-bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia-scotus-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Temple Law Faculty React to the Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia SCOTUS Decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/","name":"Voices at Temple","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/141d3fbdbb98710ce0925aefbd0e23c0","name":"Amber Bethune","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g49f6eed04a5dcf74b19c4274c59af23c","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1a31f336623ec644509e5106016d06557db8b0813f6c98de352ce8759f859cd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Amber Bethune"},"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/author\/tug31039\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/books-and-gavel-e1638561496595.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4354"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4354\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4391,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4354\/revisions\/4391"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4354"},{"taxonomy":"audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/audience?post=4354"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}