{"id":1151,"date":"2016-03-18T08:00:40","date_gmt":"2016-03-18T12:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?p=1151"},"modified":"2016-07-28T12:31:57","modified_gmt":"2016-07-28T16:31:57","slug":"ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Ideology&#8217; or &#8216;Situation Sense&#8217;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This paper reports the results of a study on whether political predispositions influence judicial decision making. The study was designed to overcome the two principal limitations on existing empirical studies that purport to find such an influence: the use of nonexperimental methods to assess the decisions of actual judges; and the failure to use actual judges in ideologically-biased-reasoning experiments. The study involved a sample of sitting judges (n = 253), who, like members of a general public sample (n = 800), were culturally polarized on climate change, marijuana legalization and other contested issues. When the study subjects were assigned to analyze statutory interpretation problems, however, only the responses of the general-public subjects and not those of the judges varied in patterns that reflected the subjects\u2019 cultural values. The responses of a sample of lawyers (n = 217) were also uninfluenced by their cultural values; the responses of a sample of law students (n = 284), in contrast, displayed a level of cultural bias only modestly less pronounced than that observed in the general-public sample. Among the competing hypotheses tested in the study, the results most supported the position that professional judgment imparted by legal training and experience confers resistance to identity-protective cognition \u2014 a dynamic associated with politically biased information processing generally \u2014 but only for decisions that involve legal reasoning. The scholarly and practical implications of the findings are discussed.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2590054&amp;download=yes\" target=\"_blank\">Download the Paper at SSRN<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>This paper was co-written with Dan M. Kahan,\u00a0Yale University &#8211; Law School; Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania; Harvard University &#8211; Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics,\u00a0Danieli Evans,\u00a0Yale Law School; Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School,\u00a0Neal Devins,\u00a0William &amp; Mary Law School, Eugene A. Lucci,\u00a0Government of the State of Ohio &#8211; Court of Common Pleas, and\u00a0Katherine Cheng,\u00a0Cultural Cognition Lab, Yale Law School.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This paper reports the results of a study on whether political predispositions influence judicial decision making. The study was designed to overcome the two principal limitations on existing empirical studies that purport to find such an influence: the use of nonexperimental methods to assess the decisions of actual judges; and the failure to use actual judges in ideologically-biased-reasoning experiments. The study involved a sample of sitting judges (n = 253), who, like members of a general public sample (n = 800), were culturally polarized on climate change, marijuana legalization and other contested issues. When the study subjects were assigned to analyze statutory interpretation problems, however, only the responses of the general-public subjects and not those of the judges varied in patterns that reflected the subjects\u2019 cultural values. The responses of a sample of lawyers (n = 217) were also uninfluenced by their cultural values; the responses of a sample of law students (n = 284), in contrast, displayed a level of cultural bias only modestly less pronounced than that observed in the general-public sample. Among &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1114,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[360,362,359,361],"audience":[],"coauthors":[27],"class_list":["post-1151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-faculty-scholarship","tag-ideology","tag-judicial-decision-making","tag-motivated-reasoning","tag-professional-judgment"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\r\n<title>&#039;Ideology&#039; or &#039;Situation Sense&#039;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment - Voices at Temple<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&#039;Ideology&#039; or &#039;Situation Sense&#039;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment - Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This paper reports the results of a study on whether political predispositions influence judicial decision making. The study was designed to overcome the two principal limitations on existing empirical studies that purport to find such an influence: the use of nonexperimental methods to assess the decisions of actual judges; and the failure to use actual judges in ideologically-biased-reasoning experiments. The study involved a sample of sitting judges (n = 253), who, like members of a general public sample (n = 800), were culturally polarized on climate change, marijuana legalization and other contested issues. When the study subjects were assigned to analyze statutory interpretation problems, however, only the responses of the general-public subjects and not those of the judges varied in patterns that reflected the subjects\u2019 cultural values. The responses of a sample of lawyers (n = 217) were also uninfluenced by their cultural values; the responses of a sample of law students (n = 284), in contrast, displayed a level of cultural bias only modestly less pronounced than that observed in the general-public sample. Among &hellip;\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Voices at Temple\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-18T12:00:40+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-28T16:31:57+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"840\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"560\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David A. Hoffman\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David A. Hoffman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Beckie Schatschneider\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/505b7875ef49205bf81379b92d47f94e\"},\"headline\":\"&#8216;Ideology&#8217; or &#8216;Situation Sense&#8217;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-18T12:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-28T16:31:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":310,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/Courtroom-Epstein.png\",\"keywords\":[\"ideology\",\"Judicial decision making\",\"motivated reasoning\",\"professional judgment\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Faculty Scholarship\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"'Ideology' or 'Situation Sense'? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment - Voices at Temple\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/Courtroom-Epstein.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-18T12:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-28T16:31:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/505b7875ef49205bf81379b92d47f94e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/Courtroom-Epstein.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/cms\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/Courtroom-Epstein.png\",\"width\":840,\"height\":560,\"caption\":\"Courtroom\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8216;Ideology&#8217; or &#8216;Situation Sense&#8217;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/\",\"name\":\"Voices at Temple\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/505b7875ef49205bf81379b92d47f94e\",\"name\":\"Beckie Schatschneider\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g9dc77189f33a293d2c82a50cd24ebb9f\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Beckie Schatschneider\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www2.law.temple.edu\\\/voices\\\/author\\\/rschatsc\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Ideology' or 'Situation Sense'? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment - Voices at Temple","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Ideology' or 'Situation Sense'? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment - Voices at Temple","og_description":"This paper reports the results of a study on whether political predispositions influence judicial decision making. The study was designed to overcome the two principal limitations on existing empirical studies that purport to find such an influence: the use of nonexperimental methods to assess the decisions of actual judges; and the failure to use actual judges in ideologically-biased-reasoning experiments. The study involved a sample of sitting judges (n = 253), who, like members of a general public sample (n = 800), were culturally polarized on climate change, marijuana legalization and other contested issues. When the study subjects were assigned to analyze statutory interpretation problems, however, only the responses of the general-public subjects and not those of the judges varied in patterns that reflected the subjects\u2019 cultural values. The responses of a sample of lawyers (n = 217) were also uninfluenced by their cultural values; the responses of a sample of law students (n = 284), in contrast, displayed a level of cultural bias only modestly less pronounced than that observed in the general-public sample. Among &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/","og_site_name":"Voices at Temple","article_published_time":"2016-03-18T12:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-28T16:31:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":840,"height":560,"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"David A. Hoffman","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David A. Hoffman","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/"},"author":{"name":"Beckie Schatschneider","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/505b7875ef49205bf81379b92d47f94e"},"headline":"&#8216;Ideology&#8217; or &#8216;Situation Sense&#8217;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment","datePublished":"2016-03-18T12:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-28T16:31:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/"},"wordCount":310,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png","keywords":["ideology","Judicial decision making","motivated reasoning","professional judgment"],"articleSection":["Faculty Scholarship"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/","name":"'Ideology' or 'Situation Sense'? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment - Voices at Temple","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png","datePublished":"2016-03-18T12:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-28T16:31:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/505b7875ef49205bf81379b92d47f94e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png","width":840,"height":560,"caption":"Courtroom"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/ideology-situation-sense-experimental-investigation-motivated-reasoning-professional-judgment-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8216;Ideology&#8217; or &#8216;Situation Sense&#8217;? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/","name":"Voices at Temple","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/#\/schema\/person\/505b7875ef49205bf81379b92d47f94e","name":"Beckie Schatschneider","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g9dc77189f33a293d2c82a50cd24ebb9f","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62b6c5fa1068c42262dab498d74cb3fc60fbba8344047dc13348bd3aacf7b70a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Beckie Schatschneider"},"url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/author\/rschatsc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Courtroom-Epstein.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1151"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1153,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions\/1153"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1114"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/audience?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}