{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Voices at Temple","provider_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices","title":"Court Rulings Support Trump's Muslim Immigration Plan - Voices at Temple","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IVQDsQEG08\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/court-rulings-support-trumps-muslim-immigration-plan\/\">Court Rulings Support Trump&#8217;s Muslim Immigration Plan<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/court-rulings-support-trumps-muslim-immigration-plan\/embed\/#?secret=IVQDsQEG08\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Court Rulings Support Trump&#8217;s Muslim Immigration Plan&#8221; &#8212; Voices at Temple\" data-secret=\"IVQDsQEG08\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www2.law.temple.edu\/voices\/cms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Donald-Trump.png","thumbnail_width":840,"thumbnail_height":560,"description":"The hysterical response to Donald Trump\u2019s proposal to restrict Muslim immigration is unwarranted. Contrary to the claims of Trump\u2019s critics, the power to suspend the admission of \u201cany aliens or any class of aliens into the United States\u201d is expressly reserved by statute to the president whenever the president finds that such admission \u201cwould be detrimental to the interests of the United States.\u201d Candidate Trump is telling us that President Obama should use this power, and that a President Trump would. Despite vigorous assertions by talking heads that suspending the admission of Muslim immigrants would be unconstitutional, prior Supreme Court opinions clearly suggest that courts would reject constitutional challenges to any president\u2019s proposed suspension of Muslim admission into the United States in accordance with U.S. law. In the leading case of Fiallo v. Bell, the Supreme Court in 1977 noted, \u201cOur cases \u2018have long recognized the power to expel or exclude aliens as a fundamental sovereign attribute exercised by the government\u2019s political departments largely immune from judicial control.\u2019\u201d In upholding the authority of the government &hellip;"}