Securities Law

Executive Private Misconduct

by
A file folder with the word "Private" on the front

In recent years, private misbehavior of corporate executives like Harvey Weinstein, Steve Wynn, Leslie Moonves, and Elon Musk has outraged many people around the world. Such misconduct – when made public – has frequently damaged the executives’ public reputations, diminished the value of their companies’ stock, and raised some serious legal and policy issues. Part of the challenge in dealing with misbehaving business executives is that the two bodies of law and regulation that govern much of American business – state corporate law and federal securities law – were largely designed to address the professional duties of executives and not their personal lives. Temple Law Professor Tom Lin proposes an original and workable roadmap for conceptualizing, navigating, and addressing executive private misconduct.

SEC Ratchets Up Enforcement Against Attorneys in Microcap Space

by

Introduction Earlier this year, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton fired a warning shot across the bow of practicing securities attorneys: “act responsibly and hold [yourselves] to high standards.” Chairman Clayton specifically called out members of the securities bar advising clients on initial coin offerings (ICOs) that were not being registered with the SEC under the federal

Incentive Compensation Under the Regulatory Spotlight

by

Six U.S. federal financial regulatory agencies[1] in May 2016 revised and re-proposed rules that were originally proposed in 2011, to govern the incentive compensation practices at financial institutions with consolidated assets of at least $1 billion (covered institutions). The proposed rules include new – and more stringent – requirements, especially for the largest institutions. The rules